Hosting

The rise of artificial intelligence has sparked both innovation and chaos within search engine optimization (SEO). As a software developer with years of experience in web technologies like Joomla and self-hosted solutions, I've seen trends come and go. Recently, I shared some thoughts on X (formerly Twitter) about the pitfalls of over-relying on AI slop content creation and the enduring value of solid technical practices.

Those posts got me thinking deeper, and I believe it's time to expand on them into a full article. Here, I'll highlight good and bad uses of AI in content and SEO, expose the flawed strategies most modern SEO companies push, and stress the need for proactive yet principled action. White-hat is the only way to avoid penalties. If you're gaming the system, sooner or later, a penalty is coming your way and it might not be a price you're willing to pay. But pay you will.

AI as a Spam Machine

Let's start with the dark side. The web is flooded with what many have named "AI slop": low-effort, machine-generated content churned out en masse to game search engines. In one of my recent X posts, I called out so-called SEO experts whose own sites reveal their inadequacy:

This highlights a classic bad use of AI (and shady tactics in general): prioritizing quantity over quality. Most modern SEO companies push two core strategies: aggressive link-building and "topical authority." Their link-building? Spamming thousands of backlinks to low-quality directories, forums, and PBNs. Their topical authority? Flooding sites with AI-generated articles on every micro-variation of a keyword to drown out competitors in volume.

Site owners cheer when DR spikes fast from this spam. They see the numbers climb and think they've won. Then the other shoe drops. Algorithm updates hit, and those gains evaporate overnight. The result is thin, repetitive content that adds zero real value but temporarily boosts visibility through saturation. Bad uses extend to link schemes. Just as link farms were crushed by Google Penguin, today's AI-fueled backlink spam follows the same doomed path. Paying for low-quality links inflates metrics short-term but tanks domain authority (see the DR 29 example above). Google is already hitting back hard with Helpful Content Update and SpamBrain. If your strategy is AI-automated spam, you're building on quicksand.

What Goes Up Fast Comes Down Faster

I know this pain personally. My own DR fell 13 points in two weeks, from 48 to 35, because of CDN errors in Europe returning 500s. I fixed it quickly once I spotted the issue, but the damage was done. Those points don't come back in a month. They take many months to recover, if at all. The web doesn't reward speed of decline with speed of recovery.

Site owners chasing spam-fueled DR surges learn this the hard way. The climb is artificial and fragile. The fall is brutal and sticky. Google remembers. Trust erodes. And rebuilding takes consistent, clean effort over time. I wish I'd caught my CDN issue sooner. I'd have far less ground to claw back now.

I’ve also seen this play out with a client. They resisted adding any content or negotiating relevant backlinks to their site, fearing it would tip off competitors to details they’d missed or clients they could snipe. It's frustrating to watch them instead purchase spam backlinks from a shady SEO company, only to see their domain rank sink into the abyss. No content, few quality backlinks, and purchased spam backlinks is a one-way ticket to the basement. Removing that spam takes time, and the SERPs don’t forgive quickly. Proactive doesn’t mean reckless action; it means smart, sustainable moves.

AI as a Thoughtful Assistant

I'm not anti-AI; far from it. In another X post, I reflected on an old Joomla hack I wrote years ago and how AI fits into my workflow today:

Here, AI shines as a tool for enhancement, not domination. Good uses include:

• Organizing Ideas: AI helps brainstorm outlines or cluster concepts, turning chaos into structure.
• Refining Language: It suggests smoother phrasing while preserving your voice.
• Technical Aids: It generates meta descriptions, alt text, or schema markup drafts (which I always refine by hand).
• Research Support: It speeds up fact-checking or source summaries without writing the core content.

In my work, I use AI lightly while obsessing over technical SEO: semantic markup, schema.org compliance, site speed, mobile optimization. For example, I'm updating that old Joomla tutorial into a structured data plugin so search engines truly understand my content. This builds lasting value, not flash-in-the-pan gains.

Link Spam & AI Slop

Most SEO agencies today sell a broken formula that gives short-term wins, but long-term losses:

1. Link-Building = Spam Networks: They promise "authority" via thousands of backlinks from irrelevant, low-DR sites. This is digital pollution. Google devalues or penalizes it.
2. Topical Authority = AI Content Flood: They generate 500+ articles per site using AI to "cover the topic cluster." It's not authority; it's noise. Users bounce, engagement dies, and algorithms notice.

This isn't strategy; it's gaming a system that’s already adapting. Google’s E-E-A-T framework rewards real expertise, not volume. Sites crushed in the March 2024 Core Update were heavy on scaled AI content AND site reputation abuse.

The pattern is clear: Spam works until it doesn’t. Link farms work until they don't. AI slop is valuable until it isn't. Google doesn't just turn off the boost - they reverse it. If your SEO is wearing a black hat - the eye of Google will soon be upon them.

AI Slop is a Temporary SEO Boost

How long will the AI slop party last? I predict 1-2 years, tops. Search engines are rapidly improving AI content detection and user satisfaction signals (dwell time, bounce rate, pogo-sticking). Low-value pages will be de-indexed en masse.

Meanwhile, sites with bulletproof technical foundations (fast loads, proper schema, clean code, high-quality natural backlinks) will rise. True topical authority comes from depth, not breadth: 10 exceptional articles beat 1,000 mediocre ones every time.

Quality content (human-written or human-edited with real insight) assisted by AI, not driven by it, will dominate. Technical SEO never went away; it was just drowned out by noise. It’s coming back.

Bet on Quality and Technical Mastery

The web rewards those who build to last. My DR drop from 48 to 35 wasn’t fixed with AI articles or link spam; it was fixed by diagnosing and repairing CDN errors in Europe. Real problems need real solutions.

White-hat is the only sustainable path. Game the system, and the penalty will find you. It may take months or years, but it will come. And when it does, the cost in lost traffic, wasted time, and shattered trust is far higher than any short-term gain.

Being proactive is critical in today’s internet, but that doesn’t mean doing something for the sake of doing something. Adding value through quality content and organic backlinks builds a foundation that lasts. My client’s fear of competition led them to spam, and now they’re paying the price with a sinking rank. Focus on value: solve problems, share hard-earned insights, and optimize technically.

AI is a co-pilot, not the pilot.